![]() |
|
| Roofwater harvesting using slow sand filtration | |
Links
Home > System overview What to test for Filter pictures Water clarity First flush diverter 2500 gallon cistern About this website Water Test Results External links Slow sand filter FAQ |
Putting togther a system System design will vary but generally there will be a first flush diverter, a filter, and a storage container. The storage should be as large as possible. It can be a tank underground, above ground or partially buried. Water storage containers are referred to as cisterns. They are often built underground or partially underground. ![]() The system shown below that works with Filter 4 (the middle blue barrel with the white bucket on top) has been in operation for 2 months. Detailed illustrations of this slow sand filter construction are available here. A short video illustrating the operation of the system is avaialble here. Samples of water were sent to the EPA certified testing lab on 2012-02-06 (Feb 6, 2012). The results are noted below the picture. ![]() NEW February 8, 2012: I spoke with the testing lab this afternoon. The test results are here. The filter is working: Post-filter: no detectable coliform (this also means there is no e coli or fecal coliform present in the filter output water ) Pre-filter: 1200 cfu per 100 ml each of the 1200 units represents a visible living colony formed from 1 coliform microbe. Storage: 3 coliform cfu per 100 ml, but no e coli Specifically, this means that water directly out of the filter has no detectable coliform bacteria in it, and water from storage is slightly contaminated with 3 coliform per 100ml but contains no e coli. IMPORTANT: This does show that contamination can come from anywhere. I had meticulously and extra carefully cleaned out the storage container with disinfectant and made sure the container was closed tightly. Still, from somewhere some coliform has managed to get into the system after the filter output. This is why it is imperitive that it be understood the water from this filter is NOT intended to be potable without careful monitoring by knowlegeable persons; and that the operation of a DIY filter is totally the responsibility of the owner/operator. No matter how careful a person is, contamination can come from anywhere. A uv filter is an absolute necessity. However, inside the filter at the output and inside the output pipe there is only purified water. But there is more. . . . While I cannot recommend this filter as a day to day unmonitored source of drinking water, one must think aobut this: In an emergency situation (think earthquake, flooding, massive power outages, mad scrambles for bottled water at the grocery store) when there is NO water avaiable from your usual source - this means no water - nada, zilch, ok? What will you do? Drink from a mud puddle? Think about it - Hmmmm. . . . . It is important to note that the water which has been going into the filter on an ongoing basis has a high coliform count, and for four days before the tests went in, this highly contaminated stagnant water from the diverter storage was running through the filter (and still is). For a complete change of water to flow through the filter 33 gallons (about 125 litres) need to move through the filter. The sand holds 50 percent water by volume plus 10 gallons on top of the sand. (.5 X 45 gallons = 22.5 plus 10 gallons of water on top of the sand makes 33 gallons or about 125 litres). Over 40 gallons were added during the 4 day period prior to the tests, so we can be certain that the ouput water which was hightly contaminated when it entered the filter was purified when finished at the output. This system has a recirculation pump, which is not absolutely necessary. The recirculation can be done manually each day, or ideally, unfiltered input water can be added once a day. Notice that each part of the system is downhill from the preceeding part - the diverter is downhill from the roof, the filter is downhill from the diverter, and the storage is downhill from the filter. This system can function with only gravity as the method of moving water through to storage, and would operate where there is no access to electricty, or petrol powered devices. The recirculation pump is a convenience that can easily be powered by an off-the-grid renewable power source. It is important to know that water containing oxygen and organic material must be flowing through the filter in order to keep the microbes in the biofilm (schmutzdecke) alive. At this location, summer months bring little or no rain, so recirculation of filtered water is the only way to keep the biofilm alive in the filter. We take some water (2 or 3 litres a day) from the filtered water storage, and run it through the filter again Four years of tests and operation on the system with Filter 1, which is similar in design to the filter system shown above, have shown that this method of recirculating filtered water does indeed work. As with Filter 1's system, enough water is retained in the diverter storgage barrel to allow small amounts of it to be added weekly to the filter (add 100 ml of unfiltered to each 2 or 3 litres of filtered) input along with the filtered water. This supplys the nutrients that keep the biofilm alive during the dry season. note During extended warm dry periods, the water in the diverter storage barrel may become stagnant. Do not put chlorine, ozone, or any chemical disinfectant in that water. If any disinfectant gets into the filter it will destroy the benefical microbes in the schmutzdecke and ruin the filter. As you recirculate filtered water, pour some of the filtered water into the diverter as you remove some to run through the filter; this will mix purified water with the unfiltered water in the barrel and reduce the contamination. Do not put contaminated water in the filtered water storage and use separate containers for recirculation and pure water, however - this is a no brainer but I am mentioning it anyway - don't mix the containers up. Fifty gallons will easily last the entire summer, and by the time the end of the summer arrives, the water in the diverter storage will be nearly clean.DO NOT USE CHLORINE OR OZONE OR ANY KIND OF DISINFECTANT IN YOUR SYSTEM WATER THAT WILL BE RUN THROUGH THE SLOW SAND FILTER - it will kill most of the good bacteria, protozoa, and zooplankton that make a slow sand filter work, and ruin the filter's effectiveness. To increase the overall safety of the system POST-FILTER WATER (WATER THAT FLOWS OUT OF THE SLOW SAND FILTER AND WILL NOT FLOW BACK IN) may need disinfectant; but this is not the best solution. A UV filter is the best way to kill any bacteria that may enter the filtered supply. Also, DO NOT BACKWASH YOUR SLOW SAND FILTER - EVER. you will ruin it. Cleaning is done by wet harrowing. The best practice is to have enough throughput from the slow sand filter to adequately handle the flow from the diverter. This may require 3 or 4 filters hooked up in parallel. Water does not flow fast through a biological sand filter; flow rates will vary depending on conditions. Sand size and length of run time are two variables that will significantly influence flow rate. Typically 35 to 55 litres per hour will flow from a filter constructed in a 20 inch diamter 4 foot deep barrel, when the filter bed is "mature". This is much slower than water from a downspout in a moderate rain event. Five or six filters or one large one would be a good idea if your entire water supply depends on the system. note These numbers are only valid for this filter and this situation. The amount of recirculation will need to be determined for any other filter by appropriate testing based on that filter's operating environment. The operation of any diy filter is totally the responsibilty of the owner/operator. The amounts mentioned here may not work in another situation. You have been advised. |